Saturday, January 13, 2007

I blog, therefore I am

Technology kills me.. I am here because because everyone else's here.. I hate typing.. Writing with pen - fountain pen is more fun.. I still like Chelpark and my Hero pen.. The only problem is that I don't find Chelpark anywhere anymore.. I also don't find Hero pen anywhere anymore.. I have the pen but the nib is broken.. People are simply refusing to repair it.. To add up to my problem Berty has lost the cover of the pen.. I do have a Waterman and Lamy and Scheaffer.. And believe me these are wonderful pens.. So why am I here.. Its probably I can not put two dots after each statement after all statements.. Just two dots.. Neither one nor three.. Only two.. One dot indicates end of statement.. Two dots indicate something more needs to be told.. Three dots are too much.. Either indicates complete end of statement - over and out kinds or a lot needs to be told.. Two is just perfect.. Anyway (mind you, not anyways with an S), I just love this invention of Bill Gates.. MS word.. Somehow I always end up thinking that everything related to computer is invention of Bill Gates.. So I am because I blog - so am here.. This is not so good as I blog, therefore I am - which is actually a bad copy of Rene Descartes - I think, therefore I am.. I know I am not making sense.. I dont want to make any sense in the first place.. Two, things which dont make sense are like outliers in data.. Outliers can be useful though.. Outliers make more sense when you slice and dice data.. Anyway (without an extra s), blogging will continue - I think..

5 comments:

ShopAddictReview said...

See you blog coz u don't have anything else to do.. n by doing all these things u feel tht u are really cool kinds... which actually u r not..

so pls stop writing these blogs n then promoting them to others..

you sound like those "wanna be cool" kinds..

by writing such blogs don't thtink tht u ll turn out to be writer...

Parul said...

hey amol,
i am a little confused by your posts..in one of them (dont hurt my irreligious feelings) you talk about being against all groupism..
which indicates your inclination towards existentialism..the basic tenet of it being that the absence of any transcendental force(i.e. god)means that the individual is free and ultimately responsible for his own actions.At some other point you have referred to Descartes..who says that humans can be certain of their consciousness, which is therefore the truth (cogito ergo sum).Existentialism decisively rejects this argument. Please elaborate...

Anonymous said...

ps. note the two dots..

A said...

Response to Parul: Rejecting 'groupism' should not be mistaken as 'believing' in existentialism. Secondly, existentialism does not necessarily omit God (though most like Nietzsche do), though it certainly means being free to choose your own path and it certainly rejects Descartes. I quoted Descartes for the title 'I blog, therefore I am' - just to highlight the width and depth of blogging.

By the way I am not atheist but agnostic. Yes, but certainly I am irreligious person.

I hope somethings definitely got cleared. Do drop by more if required..

A said...

Response to Ravinder's comments: No comments!